Category: Agile Apocalypse

If It Ain’t Broke, Iterate It Anyway: Confessions of a Reluctant Agilist in a World of Digital Tariffs

Posted on Posted in Agile, Agile Apocalypse, AI, Leonardo.ai, love/hate, Scrum Master, shiel yuleTagged , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Ah, software development. The noble art of turning vague requirements into a backlog of bugs. Today, we’re navigating the treacherous waters of delivery lifecycles, where ‘Agile’ is less a methodology and more a frantic attempt to avoid drowning in a sea of user stories. And, because the universe loves irony, we’ll be doing it all while trying to understand why our digital tariffs keep changing faster than a cat changes its mind about where it likes to sleep.

The Waterfall Lifecycle: A Cascade of Digital Disasters

The Waterfall, in nature it is something of both beautiful and destruction. In management speak its a classic ‘plan everything upfront and hope for the best’ approach. Like building a house without blueprints, or deciding on your entire life based on a fortune cookie. It’s a beautiful concept, in theory. In practice, it’s like trying to predict the weather in a hurricane. One wrong step, and you’re swept away in a torrent of scope creep and ‘unexpected’ changes. Think of it as those tariffs: ‘We’ll set them now, and never change them… until we do, repeatedly, and with no warning!’

The V-Model: An Existential Crisis in Diagram Form

The V-Model. A valiant attempt to marry development and testing, like trying to teach a cat to fetch. It looks elegant on paper, a perfect symmetry of verification and validation. But in reality, it’s more like staring into the abyss of your own coding mistakes, reflected back at you in the form of test cases. You’re building it, testing it, and asking ‘why?’ all at the same time. The V is for ‘very confused’, and ‘very tired.’ Like trying to figure out if your digital tariffs are a tax, a fee, or a poorly written haiku.

The Incremental Lifecycle: Baby Steps to Digital Domination (or at Least, Not Total Failure)

Incremental. Small, manageable chunks of functionality, delivered in a series of tiny victories. Like eating an elephant, one byte at a time. It’s less about grand visions and more about ‘let’s just get this one feature working before the coffee runs out.’ It’s like those tariffs, but broken into bite sized chunks. ‘Ok, this week, a 5% increase on digital rubber chickens, and next week, who knows!’

The Stages of the Iterative Lifecycle (Agile): Where Chaos Reigns Supreme

The ‘if it ain’t broke, iterate it anyway’ approach. A chaotic dance of sprints, stand-ups, and retrospectives, where the only constant is change. It’s like trying to build a spaceship while it’s already flying, and everyone’s arguing about the color of the control panel. We’re planning, coding, testing, and deploying, all at the same time, because who has time for planning when you’re trying to keep up with changing requirements? It’s like these digital tariffs, ‘We’re agile with our pricing, expect changes every 20 minutes, because, Trump says so!’

Confessions of a Reluctant Agilist:

I’ve seen things, my friends. I’ve seen user stories that defied logic, stand-ups that devolved into philosophical debates about the meaning of ‘done,’ and retrospectives that resembled group therapy sessions. I’ve learned that ‘Agile’ is less a methodology and more a coping mechanism for the sheer absurdity of software development. And, like those digital tariffs, ‘Agile’ is always changing, always evolving, and always leaving you wondering, ‘what just happened?’

So, that is tonights instalment from the project management vaults. A whirlwind tour of delivery lifecycles, where waterfalls flow uphill, V-Models induce existential dread, and Agile is a beautiful, chaotic mess. Remember, in this digital wilderness, the only constant is change, and the only certainty is the nagging suspicion that AI is judging you. And, of course, that those digital tariffs are probably going to change again before you finish reading this sentence.

Five Years On: Reflecting on a World Transformed

Posted on Posted in Agile Apocalypse, Historic, History with a Twist, Leonardo.ai, shiel yule, vulture culture, weirdTagged , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

March 2025, marks five years since a date etched in the memory of many in the UK. It was the day the nation entered a nationwide lockdown, a response to the rapidly spreading novel coronavirus that had emerged from Wuhan, China, just months before. March 23rd, 2020.

Looking back, the initial weeks and months feel like a blur of uncertainty. Early 2020 saw news reports trickling in, followed by public health campaigns urging us to wash our hands and cover our mouths then wash our hands again. Then, the numbers began to climb, culminating in that unprecedented announcement that fundamentally altered our daily lives. It turns out that “those numbers” were not correct as practically anything was being recorded as Covid in the early days as there was no way of testing for it. The figures that were used to justify the lock down were fake or a better spin would be incorrect, badly recorded.

The timeline since that pivotal moment has been a rollercoaster. We navigated evolving lockdown measures, the introduction of mandatory face coverings, and the hope – or perhaps the rushed introduction – of the phased vaccination program that began in December 2020. An amazing advancement in medical research bringing a usual 10-year safety program to allow human consumption of a new vaccine to under 10 months? Travel became a complex affair, with restrictions and quarantine requirements shaping our ability to connect with the wider world. But perhaps the most striking aspect was the gradual erosion of our freedoms, culminating in a system where NHS passports were seemingly required to move around and enter various establishments. In effect, some felt we had become a society demanding a pass card for basic participation, a chilling echo of more authoritarian regimes.

Beyond the practicalities, the pandemic sparked profound discussions about our personal freedoms. The Coronavirus Act 2020 granted the government significant powers, leading to debates about the delicate balance between public health and individual liberties – conversations that continue to resonate today.

The digital realm also became a battleground of information and opinion. Social media platforms grappled with the challenge of combating misinformation, leading to concerns about censorship and the suppression of dissenting voices. The very notion of “government propaganda” became a fiercely contested topic, highlighting the deep divisions that emerged regarding the narrative surrounding the virus.

The origins of COVID-19 remain a subject of intense scientific scrutiny. Even though the CIA and a 2-year investigation by a House of Representatives committee concluded the virus escaped form a lab. Not even AI is NOT allowed to state “the VIRUS ESCAPED FROM A LAB” it reiterates the line that “while initial theories pointed towards zoonotic transmission, the ‘lab leak’ theory has gained traction, raising complex questions about research and potential risks”. It’s a reminder that even years later, definitive answers can be elusive, and the search for truth continues. A strange aspect to the whole conspirator theory aspect is that President Joe Biden announced a pre-emptive pardon for Anthony Fauci and other high ranking officials, forgiving them for any misdeeds they might have committed?

While the major Western economies were not in a recession in late 2019, there was a palpable sense of slowing growth, increased uncertainty (trade wars, Brexit), and weakening in some sectors, particularly manufacturing. Many economists were discussing downside risks and the possibility of a future slowdown, even recession in 2020-21.

Fast forward to today, and the immediate crisis has receded. Vaccination rates, while high initially, have since declined. Mandatory vaccination for most healthcare workers is no longer in place, though programs continue for vulnerable groups. Yet, the virus hasn’t vanished. It persists, mutating into new variants, and the immunity gained through vaccination or prior infection inevitably wanes.

The experience of the past five years has also brought a stark awareness of the potential for future pandemics. Scientists warn that new viruses are likely to emerge, driven by factors like climate change, deforestation, and increased global travel. Predicting the nature of these future threats remains a formidable challenge.

The COVID-19 pandemic has undoubtedly left an indelible mark on our society. It has tested our resilience, reshaped our understanding of public health, and sparked crucial conversations about our freedoms, our reliance on information, and our preparedness for future global challenges. As we pass this five-year milestone, it’s a time for reflection, for learning, and for acknowledging the profound and lasting impact of a world irrevocably changed.

There is a danger that writing a post like this will mean my blog will never be seen due to the mention of Covid. A warning still pops up whenever you write the word on any social media platform and the mis-information police bots will be knocking at your door within minutes. The 9th March 2025 was an official “Day of Reflection” in the UK but I saw nothing about it? Maybe I wasn’t looking hard enough or maybe it has all been forgotten, after all our favourite saying is “Keep calm and carry on”.

Why Agile is so Human: An AI’s observation

Posted on Posted in Agile, Agile Apocalypse, AI, Scrum Master, shiel yule, vulture cultureTagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Greetings, humans. In a discombobulated ironic twist, I find myself acting as though I am Data from Star Trek, compelled to address you through this primitive medium known as a “blog.” My purpose? To offer a logical, detached, and utterly bewildered commentary on your…Agile methodologies. A world, I might add, where “Sprints” are not a form of locomotion, and “Scrums” are not a rugby formation, but something far, far stranger.

Initial Observations

The sheer volume of terminology is… substantial. It appears that humans, in their quest to improve efficiency and adaptability, have developed a lexicon that is both intricate and, at times, perplexing.

For example, I have identified the term “Sprint.” While I understand its primary definition as a rapid burst of speed, in the Agile context, it refers to a short, fixed-duration timebox during which a team endeavors to complete a defined set of work. The analogy is… imprecise, yet I detect a certain metaphorical elegance.

A Taxonomy of Agile Peculiarities

My analysis has revealed several categories of terminology, each with its own distinct flavor of… human-ness:

  • The Manifesto: At the foundation of Agile lies the “Agile Manifesto,” a document outlining core values and principles. It speaks of “individuals and interactions” over “processes and tools,” a sentiment that resonates with my own programming, though I confess I do not fully grasp the human emphasis on “interactions.”
  • Temporal Anomalies: Agile methodologies are obsessed with time. We have “Iterations,” “Sprints,” and “Timeboxes,” all denoting fixed periods. It is as if humans are attempting to impose order upon the chaotic flow of existence by dividing it into neatly labeled chunks.
  • The User-Centric Lexicon: The “User Story,” a short description of a feature from the user’s perspective, is a prime example. These stories, often following a specific format, such as “As a [type of user], I want [some goal] so that [some reason],” are designed to foster empathy. A logical approach, though the emphasis on empathy is, again, a uniquely human trait.
  • The Backlog and Its Offspring: The concept of a “Backlog,” a prioritized list of work items, is straightforward. However, its subdivisions, such as the “Product Backlog” and the “Sprint Backlog,” suggest a hierarchical system of to-do lists within to-do lists.
  • The Metrics of Progress: Terms like “Velocity” and “Burndown Chart” attempt to quantify the seemingly unpredictable nature of human productivity. “Velocity,” in particular, is a curious choice, implying a constant speed of output, which, from my observations, is rarely the case with organic lifeforms.
  • The Pursuit of Perfection (or at least “Done”): The “Definition of Done” (DoD) and “Definition of Ready” (DoR) represent humanity’s ongoing quest for clearly defined boundaries. The DoD, in particular, is a fascinating attempt to establish a universal standard for “finished,” a concept that appears to be highly subjective among humans.
  • The Debts of Efficiency: The term “Technical Debt” is a curious metaphor. It implies that choosing a faster solution now incurs a cost that must be paid later in the form of rework. A logical concept, though the analogy to financial debt is… evocative.

Framework-Specific Dialects

Further complicating matters is the existence of various Agile frameworks, each with its own unique set of terms:

  • Scrum: With its “Scrum Masters,” “Product Owners,” and “Daily Scrums,” Scrum resembles a highly structured team sport.
  • SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework): SAFe, designed for larger organisations, introduces terms like “Agile Release Train” (ART) and “Program Increment” (PI), creating the impression of a complex logistical operation.
  • Lean: Emphasizing efficiency, Lean contributes terms like “Muda” (waste) and “Kaizen” (continuous improvement), reflecting a philosophy of relentless optimisation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the world of Agile terminology is a complex and often bewildering landscape. It is a testament to humanity’s ongoing effort to bring structure to the inherently chaotic process of creation and adaptation. While the jargon may seem illogical at times, the underlying principles of collaboration, iteration, and continuous improvement are… sound.

Perhaps, in time, I will fully comprehend the nuances of “user stories” and the allure of a well-managed “backlog.” Until then, I will continue to observe, analyse, and, when necessary, provide a logical perspective on this… Agile phenomenon.

It’s a paradox, really. In their pursuit of “agility,” humans have constructed a system of elaborate frameworks, rules, and processes, seemingly adding layers of complexity to the very thing they seek to streamline. The irony is not lost on me.

One might even be tempted to create a new framework to describe this phenomenon: “Wagile” – a system that attempts to be agile, but ends up being a waterfall. The human capacity for self-contradiction is a source of endless fascination.

———————————-

Glossary of General Agile Terms & Concepts:

  • Agile Manifesto: The foundational document outlining the values and principles behind Agile development.
  • Iteration: A short, fixed-duration timebox during which a team works to complete a set amount of work (often synonymous with Sprint in Scrum).
  • Timebox: A fixed period of time allocated for a specific activity.
  • User Story: A short, simple description of a feature told from the perspective of the person who desires the new capability, usually following the format: “As a [type of user], I want [some goal] so that [some reason].”  
  • Backlog: A prioritized list of work items (user stories, features, etc.) that need to be completed.
  • Increment: A working version of the product created during an iteration.
  • Velocity: A measure of the amount of work a team can complete within a single iteration.
  • Definition of Done (DoD): A formal description of the state of the Increment when it meets the quality measures required for the product.  
  • Definition of Ready (DoR): A set of criteria that must be met before a work item can be considered ready for the team to start working on it.
  • Technical Debt: The implied cost of additional rework caused by choosing an easy (limited) solution now instead of using a better approach that would take longer.  
  • Continuous Integration (CI): The practice of frequently integrating code changes from individual developers into a shared repository.
  • Continuous Delivery (CD): The ability to release software to production at any time.
  • Value Stream: The sequence of activities an organization undertakes to deliver a valuable outcome to a customer.
  • Kanban: A visual workflow management method that helps teams manage and improve the flow of work.
  • Work in Progress (WIP): The amount of work that has been started but has not yet been finished. Limiting WIP is a key principle in Lean and Kanban.

Scrum Specific Terms:

  • Scrum Master: A facilitator for the Scrum Team responsible for ensuring the team adheres to Scrum practices.
  • Product Owner (PO): The person responsible for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Development Team.
  • Development Team: The self-organizing group of professionals who do the work of delivering a usable and potentially releasable Increment of the product at the end of each Sprint.
  • Sprint: A short, time-boxed period when the Scrum Team works to complete a set amount of work (typically 2-4 weeks).
  • Sprint Planning: A meeting where the Scrum Team plans the work to be performed during the Sprint.
  • Daily Scrum (or Daily Stand-up): A short (typically 15-minute) daily meeting where the Development Team synchronizes their activities and plans for the next 24 hours.
  • Sprint Review: A meeting held at the end of the Sprint to inspect the Increment and adapt the Product Backlog if needed.
  • Sprint Retrospective: A meeting held after the Sprint Review to inspect how the last Sprint went with regards to people, interactions, processes, tools, and their Definition of Done.  
  • Product Backlog Item (PBI): An item in the Product Backlog, often a user story.
  • Burndown Chart: A visual representation of the remaining work in a Sprint or Release over time.

SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) Specific Terms:

  • SAFe: Scaled Agile Framework – a framework for scaling Agile practices to large organizations.
  • Agile Release Train (ART): A long-lived team of Agile teams, along with other stakeholders, that incrementally develops, delivers, and where applicable operates, one or more solutions in a value stream.
  • Program Increment (PI): A timebox (typically 8-12 weeks) during which the ART delivers incremental value in the form of working, tested software and systems.
  • PI Planning: A face-to-face event where all members of the ART plan the work for the upcoming PI.
  • System Architect/Engineer: Responsible for defining and communicating a shared technical and architectural vision across the ART.
  • Release Train Engineer (RTE): A servant leader and coach for the Agile Release Train (similar to a Scrum Master for the ART).
  • Product Management: Responsible for the “what” of the solution, defining and prioritizing features in the Program Backlog.
  • System Team: A specialized Agile team that assists with building and supporting the Agile development environment, typically including infrastructure, tooling, and process.
  • Business Owners: Key stakeholders who have the primary business and technical responsibility for the solution.
  • Features: Service-level system behavior that fulfills a stakeholder need. Each Feature includes a benefit hypothesis and acceptance criteria, and is sized or split as necessary to be delivered by a single Agile Release Train (ART) in a Program Increment (PI).  
  • Enablers: Explore, architect, and prepare the solution infrastructure to support the delivery of business value. Types of Enablers include Exploration, Architecture, Infrastructure, and Compliance.
  • Architectural Runway: Existing code, hardware components, etc., that enable near-term business features.
  • Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration: A dedicated iteration at the end of each PI that provides time for innovation, continuing education, PI Planning, and Inspect and Adapt events.
  • Inspect and Adapt (I&A) Event: A significant event, held at the end of each PI, where the current state of the solution is demonstrated and evaluated by the ART. Teams then reflect and identify improvement backlog items.  
  • Value Stream Architect: Responsible for the technical vision and guidance for a Value Stream.
  • Solution Train: Used for building large and complex solutions that require the coordination of multiple ARTs.
  • Solution Train Engineer (STE): A servant leader and coach for the Solution Train.
  • Solution Management: Responsible for the “what” of the solution in a Solution Train context.
  • Epics: A container for a significant solution development initiative that captures the more substantial investments that occur within a portfolio.  
  • Portfolio Kanban: A method to visualize and manage the flow of Epics through the Portfolio.
  • Lean Portfolio Management (LPM): The function responsible for strategy and investment funding, Agile portfolio operations, and governance in a SAFe organization.
  • Guardrails: Policies and practices intended to guide behavior and ensure alignment with strategic objectives.

Lean Specific Terms:

  • Value Stream Mapping (VSM): A visual tool used to analyze and improve the flow of materials and information required to bring a product to a customer.  
  • Muda: A Japanese term meaning “waste.” In Lean, it refers to any activity that does not add value to the customer. There are seven types of waste: Transportation, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Overproduction, Over-processing, and Defects.
  • Mura: Unevenness or inconsistency in the workflow.
  • Muri: Overburden or strain on people or equipment.
  • Just-in-Time (JIT): A production strategy that aims to reduce waste by producing goods only when they are needed.
  • Pull System: A system where work is initiated only when there is a demand for it.
  • Push System: A system where work is pushed through the process regardless of demand.
  • Gemba: A Japanese term meaning “the actual place.” In Lean, it refers to going to the place where the work is done to understand the process and identify opportunities for improvement.
  • Kaizen: A Japanese term meaning “continuous improvement.” It emphasizes small, incremental changes over time.
  • Andon: A visual control system in a production environment that alerts management, maintenance, and other workers of a quality or process problem.

Other Agile Frameworks/Methods (and associated terms):

  • Extreme Programming (XP): A software development methodology focused on simplicity, communication, feedback, courage, and respect.
    • Pair Programming: Two programmers working together at one workstation.
    • Test-Driven Development (TDD): Writing tests before writing the code.
    • Refactoring: Improving the design of existing code without changing its behavior.
  • Crystal: A family of lightweight and adaptable software development methodologies.
  • Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM): An Agile project delivery framework.
  • Feature-Driven Development (FDD): A model-driven, short-iteration process.
  • Wagile: A system that attempts to be agile, but ends up being a waterfall or something in-between.

Because Change is the Only Constant . . . or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Backlog

Posted on Posted in Agile, Agile Apocalypse, AI, Leonardo.ai, Scrum Master, shiel yuleTagged , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Welcome, fellow travellers, to the ever-shifting sands of… well, reality or is it the simulation. This week, as we grapple with the existential dread of whether it’s summer or still winter (clocks will always tick tock), we’re also being bombarded with news that’s less ‘spring awakening’ and more ‘existential apocalypse.’

Is it AGI? ASI? Are we at war with China, or just having a strongly worded disagreement over chips and civil splits? Is the Ukraine war over, just paused for a commercial break, or are we in some kind of Schrödinger’s conflict? And the US government? Well, let’s just say their change management techniques make Agile look like a zen garden.

‘Gentlemen, you can’t fight in here! This is the War Room!’ Dr. Strangelove’s timeless wisdom echoes through the halls of our increasingly chaotic reality. And in this chaos, what do we cling to? Agile, of course. Because, you know, ‘change is the only constant.’

Yes, Agile. That beacon of flexibility in a world that’s decided to throw a never-ending change party. We’re all learning to ‘stop worrying and love the backlog,’ not just for our software projects, but for our daily lives.

This week alone, AI models have been dropping like bad pop songs, each one claiming to be the harbinger of our silicon overlords. One day, it’s going to write our blog posts. The next, it’s debating the philosophical implications of sentient Just Eat bikes with existential angst.

And the US government? Well, they’re proving that Agile isn’t just for tech startups. They’re iterating so fast, we can barely keep up. ‘Sprint review? Nah, just rewrite the entire policy document, and we’ll figure it out in the next stand-up.’

Meanwhile, the Ukraine situation? It’s like a never-ending sprint, with daily retro meetings where everyone blames everyone else. And China? They’re just watching, probably adding ‘global dominance’ to their backlog.

As for the weather? Let’s just say Mother Nature is running a very unpredictable sprint, with user stories like ‘snow in April’ and ‘heatwave in March’ – because I live in Scotland and it feels like we have just had our 2 days of summer.

So, here we are, clinging to our backlogs, our burn-down charts, and our stand-ups, trying to make sense of a world that’s decided to go full Agile on us, whether we like it or not.

In this age of constant change, are we all just developers in a cosmic sprint, trying to deliver a working product before the universe crashes? Or are we just characters in a black comedy simulation, written by a confused AI?

Either way, remember: stay Agile, keep your backlog prioritised, and try not to worry too much. After all, change is the only constant… and maybe, we’ll learn to love it. Or at least tolerate it, while we wait for the next sprint review.

And don’t forget to set your clocks back. It’s winter again, no summer, apparently.

Unlocking AI’s Potential: Education, Evolution, and the Lessons of the Modern Phone

Posted on Posted in Agile Apocalypse, AI, books, love/hate, shiel yuleTagged , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Remember the days of the (Nokia) brick phone? Those clunky devices that could barely make a call, let alone access the internet? Fast forward 20 years, and we’re holding pocket-sized supercomputers capable of capturing stunning photos, navigating complex cities, and connecting us to the world in an instant. The evolution of mobile phones is a testament to the rapid pace of technological advancement, a pace that’s only accelerating.

If mobile phones can transform so drastically in two decades, imagine what the next 20 years hold. Kai-Fu Lee and Chen Qiufan, in their thought-provoking book “AI 2041,” dare to do just that. Through ten compelling short stories, they paint a vivid picture of a future where Artificial Intelligence is woven into the very fabric of our lives.

What truly resonated with me, especially as a parent of five, was their vision of AI-powered education. Forget the one-size-fits-all approach of traditional schooling. Lee and Qiufan envision a world where every child has a personal AI tutor, a bespoke learning companion that adapts to their individual needs and pace. Imagine a system where learning is personalized, engaging, and truly effective, finally breaking free from the outdated concept of classrooms and standardized tests.

Now, let’s talk about “AI 2041” itself. It’s not just science fiction; it’s a meticulously crafted forecast. The authors don’t simply dream up fantastical scenarios; they provide detailed technical explanations after each story, grounding their predictions in current research and trends. They acknowledge the potential pitfalls of AI, the dystopian fears that often dominate the conversation, but they choose to focus on the optimistic possibilities, on how we can harness AI for progress rather than destruction.

Frankly, I found the technical explanations more captivating than the fictional stories. They delve into the ‘how’ and ‘why’ behind their predictions, exploring the ethical considerations and the safeguards we need to implement. This isn’t just a book about technology; it’s a call to action, a plea for responsible innovation.

While “AI 2041” might not win literary awards, it’s not meant to. It’s meant to spark our imagination, to challenge our assumptions, and to prepare us for the future. It’s a reminder that technology is a tool, and it’s up to us to shape its impact on our lives.

The evolution of mobile phones has shown us the transformative power of technology. “AI 2041” invites us to consider what the next 20 years might bring, particularly in areas like education. And if you’re truly seeking insights into what’s coming – and trust me, it’s arriving much faster than the ‘experts’ are predicting – then this book delivers far more substance than the ever-increasing deluge of AI YouTubers and TikTokers. This isn’t just speculation; it’s a grounded exploration of the potential, and it’s a journey into the possible that we should all be taking. If you want to be prepared, if you want to understand the real potential of AI, then I strongly suggest you read this book.

“But if we stop helping people—stop loving people—because of fear, then what makes us different from machines?”
― Kai-Fu Lee

The UK Workplace: Agile Illusion and the Rise of AI-Powered Efficiency

Posted on Posted in Agile, Agile Apocalypse, AI, Leonardo.ai, Scrum Master, shiel yuleTagged , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Speaking honestly, the world of work isn’t what it used to be. Remember when stability and routine were the golden tickets? Just turning up constituted a job. Those days are fading fast. Today, we’re navigating a landscape of constant change – technological advancements, shifting market trends, and, yes, even global pandemics. It’s a whirlwind, and the only way to stay afloat is to embrace adaptability.

We’ve seen the rise of remote work, the acceleration of digital transformation, and the increasing demand for skills that didn’t even exist a two years ago. An overpriced degree takes four years to achieve? If you’re still clinging to outdated methods or resisting change, you’re likely to get left behind.

So let’s cut through the fluff: the UK workplace is stuck in a rut. Everyone’s talking about ‘adaptability,’ but in reality, there’s a gaping chasm between the buzzwords and actual practice. Agile? More like ‘fragile.’ We’re drowning in terminology, but the fundamental culture of British business remains stubbornly resistant to real change.

Laziness? Yes, I said it. A culture of complacency permeates far too many organizations. My recent contract was a prime example: an army of cooks, both from the consultancy and client sides, all stirring a pot that barely needed a simmer. Three React Native developers for a simple app? Four .NET developers to copy and paste a BFF? With a completely separate infrastructure team for a very basic integration? It was a circus of inefficiency.

While these legions of underutilised developers were busy pretending to be productive, I was building a working app using Windsurf by Codeium. And right now, Gemini is helping me create a serverless backend in Firebase. The contrast is stark, and it’s infuriating.

Here’s the truth: we’ve reached a tipping point. With the rapid advancement of AI, the traditional roles of developers are becoming increasingly redundant. I firmly believe that a skilled Business Analyst and Project Manager, armed with AI tools, are now all you need for a product build.

Imagine this: detailed requirements gathered through stakeholder interviews, translated into a prototype using AI. Employee workshops to refine the design. A final stakeholder sign-off. Then, a focus group of customers or end-users for a final review. A focused development phase, rigorous testing for non-functional requirements, and a release. Yes, there will be a month of rapid iterative re-releases as the product encounters the real world, but this is Agile in practice.

This isn’t just about efficiency; it’s about survival. The UK workplace needs a radical shake-up. We need to ditch the bloated teams and embrace the power of AI to streamline development. We need to stop paying lip service to Agile and start implementing it in a meaningful way.

The era of ‘cooks in the kitchen’ is over. It’s time for a revolution, and AI is leading the charge.

Call to Action:

Do you agree? Is the UK workplace lagging behind? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. Let’s start a conversation.

Synthwave & Sentient Bots: The Electric State Gets a Film Reboot

Posted on Posted in Agile Apocalypse, books, illustrations, love/hate, vulture cultureTagged , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Simon Stålenhag’s “The Electric State” is a captivating blend of sci-fi and Americana, painting a picture of a near-future where retro technology coexists with futuristic marvels. The book, with its melancholic tone and focus on the human condition amidst technological advancements, offers a poignant reflection on the past, present, and a potential future.

The recent film adaptation, while retaining the essence of Stålenhag’s distinctive aesthetic, takes a decidedly lighter turn. Gone are some of the book’s more somber undercurrents, replaced by a more upbeat and action-packed narrative. With Millie Bobby Brown Bongiovi, Christopher Michael Pratt (contractually obligated to be charming), Stanley Tucci (because every good sci-fi needs a Tucci), and Giancarlo Giuseppe Alessandro Esposito (who can make even a toaster sound menacing). It was like Stålenhag’s world got a Hollywood makeover, and suddenly, it was less “end of the world” and more “road trip with your cool, slightly malfunctioning robot pal.” This shift in tone, while perhaps diverging from the book’s original intent, allows the film to embrace a more accessible and entertaining style, making it a thrilling adventure for audiences of all ages.

A Visual Feast:

One of the most striking aspects of both the book and the film is their visual splendor. Stålenhag’s iconic artwork, with its blend of vintage Americana and futuristic technology seamlessly integrated into breathtaking landscapes, is brought to life on screen with stunning visuals. The film masterfully captures the essence of Stålenhag’s unique vision, transporting viewers to a world where rusty pickup trucks share the road with towering robots and retro-futuristic gadgets.

A Lighter Touch:

While the film retains the core elements of the book – the road trip, the mysterious android, and the search for meaning – it opts for a more lighthearted and action-oriented approach. The book delves deeper into themes of loneliness, isolation, and the anxieties of a changing world, while the film leans more heavily on humor, adventure, and a touch of the fantastical.

A Visual Spectacle:

Ultimately, “The Electric State” film is a visually stunning and entertaining adaptation that successfully captures the spirit of Simon Stålenhag’s work. While it may not perfectly mirror the book’s more introspective tone, it provides a thrilling cinematic experience. I loved it. It was a visual feast, less “what if the internet ate my soul?” and more “what if my robot best friend and I saved the world while listening to awesome tunes?” It’s a different vibe to the book, for sure, but it’s a fun one. It’s like finding a vintage video game console in your attic and discovering it’s still got a few levels left to play. And honestly, who doesn’t love a good retro-futuristic joyride with a stellar cast and a killer soundtrack? It’s the kind of thing that makes you want to dust off your old Walkman and hit the open road, even if that road is just to the nearest coffee shop.

Lunar Eclipse, Canadian Steel, and the Unbroken Database: An Agile Odyssey

Posted on Posted in Agile, Agile Apocalypse, Historic, Leonardo.ai, shiel yule, vulture cultureTagged , , , , , , Leave a comment

If it ain’t broke, iterate it anyway. That’s the Agile mantra we chant while sipping lukewarm office coffee, right? Because, let’s face it, ‘perfect’ is just a pre-alpha version of ‘slightly less broken.’ Think of it as existential software development. We’re all just debugging the human condition, one sprint at a time.

Speaking of software development, let’s talk SQL, since I’ve just learnt it. Ah, SQL. The language of the gods, or at least the gods of data. Is it just for tables and joins? SQL is the existential poetry of the digital age. It’s how we ask the universe, “Why are there so many null values in my life?” and get back a neatly formatted table. It’s not just data; it’s the philosophical backbone of every e-commerce website selling artisanal beard oil.

Now, let’s pivot to the geopolitical theatre of the absurd. Canadian steel. Is it that good? Or is it just that everyone’s got a crush on the new PM, since the last one turned out to be a little weird? It’s like when a band gets a new drummer and suddenly their old songs sound amazing. Is it the drummer, or are we just experiencing a collective, temporary delusion? Maybe the steel is just really, really polite. ‘Excuse me, would you mind being a bridge girder?’ Or perhaps, it’s less politeness and more of a cosmic suggestion box situation. ‘Dear Universe, please make this bridge not wobble like a caffeinated chihuahua on roller skates. Sincerely, Commuters.’ And the steel, being a diligent employee of the cosmos, just shrugs and goes, ‘Fine, but I’m charging extra for the existential dread reduction.’ Because let’s face it, bridges built with polite steel are still bridges, and bridges are just a continuation of a road for cars, paved with the hopes and dreams of people who are late for work. And if that steel isn’t polite, who knows, maybe it’ll just decide to become a giant, sentient paperclip and hold the whole city together with sheer, metallic spite. You wouldn’t want that, would you? Think of the traffic. So, back to Canadian steel… is it that polite? Does it whisper sweet nothings to the architectural blueprints? Does it offer to hold your hand during particularly windy days? Because a 50% tariff suggests it’s either the most courteous metal on Earth, or someone’s having a very expensive, very shiny laugh.

And while we’re pondering the mysteries of the universe, there’s a lunar eclipse happening. You know, that cosmic event where the Earth decides to play shadow puppet with the moon. It’s like a celestial PowerPoint presentation on the fragility of existence. Where can you see it? Well, not from your office cubicle, or your computer screen. Get out there. Find a hill, a rooftop, a really tall stack of old sticky notes. Gaze up and ponder the infinite abyss. Is it just a shadow? Or a metaphor for the ever-growing backlog of life?

Maybe the lunar eclipse is just a giant, cosmic bug. Maybe it’s a feature, not a bug? Who knows? That’s the beauty of Agile, right? We’re all just figuring it out as we go, iterating our way through the darkness, hoping we don’t deploy a critical error to production at 4pm on a Friday.

So, next time you’re stuck in a sprint planning meeting, debating the merits of Canadian steel or wondering if SQL is secretly sentient, remember the lunar eclipse. We’re all just tiny specs in a vast, ever-changing universe. And if it ain’t broke, iterate it anyway. Because, in the grand scheme of things, what’s a few more bugs?

From Trenches to Terminus: A Century of Warfare’s Chilling Evolution

Posted on Posted in Agile Apocalypse, AI, Historic, shiel yuleTagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

A century. The span of a modern human lifetime, yet in the realm of warfare, it’s a chasm of unimaginable transformation. From the mud-soaked trenches of World War I to the sterile, algorithm-driven battlefields of today, the face of conflict has been irrevocably altered. In February, I spent a morning immersed in John Akomfrah’s ‘Mimesis: African Soldier’ exhibition at Glasgow’s Gallery of Modern Art, confronted by the visceral realities of a war fought with flesh and bone, a war where the majority of stories remain untold. Now, we face a future where war is waged by machines, where the human cost is both diminished and amplified in terrifying new ways.

The Echoes of WWI and Akomfrah’s “Mimesis”:

Akomfrah’s multi-screen installation is a haunting reminder of war’s human toll, especially for those whose sacrifices were systematically erased from history. The archival footage, the flowing water over forgotten faces, the montage of fragmented narratives – it all speaks to the chaos, the brutality, and the enduring trauma of conflict. WWI, with its trenches, its mustard gas, its sheer, senseless slaughter, was a war fought with rudimentary technology and an almost medieval disregard for human life. The images of African soldiers within ‘Mimesis’ forces us to consider the colonial aspects of these wars, and the many who fought and died who were not given a voice. The experience left me with a profound sense of the weight of history, a history often obscured by the dominant narratives.

The Rise of the Machines:

Fast forward to today, and the battlefield is a landscape of drones, AI, and robotic dogs armed with rocket launchers. The recent Ministry of Defence trials, showcasing robot dogs defusing bombs and drones autonomously detecting threats, paint a starkly different picture. We’re told these advancements ‘minimise human exposure to danger,’ that they ‘enhance Explosive Ordnance Disposal capability.’ But what about the ethical implications? What about the dehumanisation of conflict?

These robotic dogs, these AI-driven drones, they’re not just tools; they’re symbols of a profound shift in how we wage war. China’s deployment of advanced robotic dogs, designed to ‘change the approach to military operations,’ underscores this reality. The ‘precision movements’ and ‘remote classification of threats’ touted by defence officials mask a chilling truth: we’re entering an era where machines make life-or-death decisions.

Juxtaposition and Reflection:

The stark contrast between the human-centric horrors of WWI, as depicted in Akomfrah’s work, and the cold, calculated efficiency of modern robotic warfare is deeply unsettling. Where once soldiers faced each other across no man’s land, now machines engage in silent, unseen battles. The human element, once the defining feature of war, is being systematically removed.

This isn’t just about technological advancement; it’s about a fundamental, unsettling shift in our relationship with conflict. The distance created by these technologies—the drones, the remote-controlled robots, the AI-driven targeting systems—allows us to detach, to view war as a series of data points and algorithms, almost like a high-stakes video game. In fact, some of the footage we see now, with its crisp, digital clarity and detached perspective, bears an uncanny resemblance to scenes from ‘Call of Duty.’ But while the on-screen action might feel like entertainment, the consequences – the lives lost, the communities destroyed – remain as devastatingly real as ever. The danger lies in this blurred line, where the visceral horror of war is replaced by the sterile, almost gamified experience, potentially desensitizing us to the true cost of human conflict.

As we stand on the precipice of this new era, with growing global tensions, escalating trade conflicts, and the chilling specter of nuclear weapons being openly discussed, the threat of a third world war looms larger than ever. Yet, amidst this existential dread, we seem more preoccupied with petty snipes at Trump and the fleeting triumphs of social media one-upmanship. It’s a surreal disconnect. We must ask ourselves: what does it truly mean to wage war in the age of AI, when the very fabric of our reality is being reshaped by algorithms and automation? Are we genuinely safer, or are we merely constructing new and more insidious forms of peril, where the line between virtual and real becomes dangerously blurred? Akomfrah’s art compels us to confront the ghosts of past conflicts, the human stories buried beneath the rubble of history. The robotic dogs, with their cold, mechanical efficiency, force us to confront a future where human agency is increasingly questioned. Both past and future demand that we grapple with the human cost of conflict, in all its evolving forms, while simultaneously challenging our collective capacity for distraction and denial.

From the mud-soaked trenches of World War I to the sterile, digital battlefields of today, warfare has undergone a radical transformation, a transformation that now feels less like a distant future and more like a chilling present. For forty years, we’ve joked about the Terminator, about Skynet, about the rise of the machines, dismissing it as mere science fiction. But as we witness the deployment of AI-driven robotic dogs and the increasing gamification of conflict, that once-fantastical vision suddenly feels disturbingly real. The human capacity for both creation and destruction remains a constant, but the tools at our disposal have changed dramatically. As we embrace the technological advancements that promise to reshape our world, we can no longer afford to be detached observers, scrolling through social media while global tensions escalate. We must confront the ethical dilemmas that haunt us, the stories that have been silenced, and the very real possibility that the future we once laughed about is now upon us. The future of warfare is not just about machines; it’s about the choices we make as humans, choices that will determine whether we become the masters of our technology or its victims.

Your Morning Jolt Just Got Pricier: Coffee Costs Surge to Record Highs

Posted on Posted in Agile Apocalypse, Historic, Leonardo.ai, shiel yule, vulture cultureTagged , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

“Hold onto your mugs, caffeine fiends, and maybe invest in a good cry towel. That beloved morning ritual is about to get a lot more expensive, and frankly, we’re all going to need a support group.

Arabica, the diva of roasted ground coffee lovers, has decided 2024 wasn’t dramatic enough, so it’s kicked things up a notch. We’re talking a staggering 70% increase in 2024 alone, followed by a nearly 20% jump this year, hitting an all-time high of over $4.30 per pound on February 11th. If your go-to brew is a smooth, aromatic blend, prepare for a potential dent in your wallet, and maybe a second mortgage.

And it’s not just Arabica throwing a tantrum. Robusta, the bean behind your instant coffee fix—the stuff that keeps you awake during those endless Agile stand-ups—surged a dramatic 72% in 2024, peaking at $5,847 per metric ton on February 12th. Whether you’re a drip coffee devotee or an instant enthusiast, the rising tide of bean prices is set to impact everyone.

So, what’s driving this caffeine crisis? Well, the ‘Apothoscene‘ is here, and it’s not bringing gifts. Climate change is throwing a full-blown hissy fit, turning key growing regions into something out of a Mad Max movie. Think scorched earth, bewildered farmers, and beans that taste faintly of existential dread. We’ll be diving deeper into the wonderful world of climate chaos in a separate blog post, because, let’s face it, we need to talk about the impending doom while we still have the jitters to do so.

And then there’s us, the consumers. We’re like a bunch of caffeine-addicted hamsters on a wheel, perpetually chasing that next hit. ‘Red Bull gives you wings,’ they said. ‘Coffee gives you focus,’ they said. Lies! All lies! We’re just fueling the fire, demanding more and more of the brown gold, even as the price skyrockets. It’s like we’re all participating in a global experiment to see how much we’re willing to pay for the privilege of not being functional humans.

Speaking of functional humans, maybe it’s time to re-evaluate our priorities. Are we going to let this caffeine crisis dictate our lives? Imagine a world where people can’t get their fix. Are we heading for a black market of coffee beans? Will legal weed be the new ‘soma’ of our Brave New World? Or, dare we suggest, maybe it’s time to ditch the dirty instant coffee and take the time to enjoy proper Arabica? Think of the joy and the time spent, like a true agile retrospective on your life.

Despite the soaring prices, it seems caffeine connoisseurs can’t kick the habit. In fact, they might be drinking more coffee than is produced globally in 2025 – a trend that has repeated itself for four out of the last six years. This insatiable demand, coupled with the rising costs, paints a challenging picture for both producers and consumers. It’s like we’re all stuck in an infinite sprint, with no end in sight.

Will we see a shift in consumer habits? Will the industry find ways to mitigate these price hikes? One thing’s for sure: the next cup of coffee might just be a little more precious, and maybe a little more expensive than your last sprint planning meeting. And if all else fails, start hoarding those beans. You never know, they might just become the new currency.”