The Void, the Billions, and the Blindfolds

Welcome back, fellow meat-sacks, to another weekly broadcast from the edge of the collapse. Pour yourself a synthetic gin, ignore the screaming from the flat downstairs, and let’s dive into the fresh hell that was this week’s news cycle.

First up, the big news from the upper stratosphere: SpaceX has finally gone public. The IPO went off like a Starship booster, launching Elon Musk into a tier of wealth so profoundly absurd that the human brain literally lacks the neural wiring to comprehend it.

Let’s do some quick math, because when we talk about “Trillions,” our primitive ape brains just think “Ooh, that’s a lot of bananas.” If you were to spend $10,000 every single day, it would take you about 273 years to spend a billion dollars. To spend a trillion dollars at that exact same daily rate? It would take you 273,972 years. Elon could have started dropping ten grand a day back when Neanderthals were still trying to figure out how flint worked, kept spending through the Ice Age, the rise of Rome, the Black Death, and the invention of TikTok, and he would still have enough change left over to buy Belgium. He isn’t just rich; he has achieved financial escape velocity. He has enough capital to legally reclassify the Moon as a private parking lot, while the rest of us are calculating whether we can afford the organic eggs or if we should just stick to the ones laid by depressed, radioactive battery chickens.

But don’t worry about the economy, because humanity is currently occupied with a much more pressing philosophical debate: What actually qualifies you as a human being? In the UK, we’ve reached peak administrative dystopian efficiency. We have narrowed our focus down to the absolute essentials of civilisation. If you misgender someone on Twitter, Scotland Yard will mobilise a tactical unit, break down your door, and ensure you face the full wrath of the law for administrative linguistic malpractice. We are terrified of words, but utterly numb to reality. Because while we hyper-fixate on the precise syllables used to describe our identities, we’ve simultaneously perfected the art of selective empathy.

If you come from certain Arab or African countries, the global consensus seems to be that you’re not quite the same brand of human. You’re more like “Humanity Lite”—a lower-tier subscription model that doesn’t include basic human rights or access to safety. Look at the Middle East, where one state has essentially gone on an unrestricted, land-grabbing rampage against its neighbours, systematically clearing out an entire race of people under the watchful, blinking eyes of Western democracy. When Yugoslavia and Rwanda happened, the world wrung its hands and whispered “Never again” with tears in its eyes. Now? It’s happening in 4K resolution, and the global reaction is a collective, bureaucratic shrug. Apparently, the “Never Again” clause had a regional rollover limit we weren’t told about. I’ll probably get cancelled or put on a watch list just for typing that paragraph, but hey—at least the cells in Belmarsh have decent Wi-Fi.

Meanwhile, in the background of this ethical dumpster fire, Artificial Intelligence is quietly turning the entire corporate world into a ghost town. Most office jobs—the ones involving spreadsheets, emails, and middle-management synergy meetings—are already functionally obsolete. The robots are here, they don’t take lunch breaks, and they don’t complain about the office temperature.

Are we preparing for this post-work utopia/distopia? Are we restructuring society to ensure we don’t all starve while algorithms write poetry? Of course not. Instead, we’ve collectively shoved our heads so far up our own social media echo chambers that we’re touching tonsils. We are scrolling through Instagram reels, frantically liking videos of capybaras, and chanting “La la la, everything is fine, I’m sure my data-entry job is completely secure, la la la” while the servers hum softly in the distance, coding our unemployment notices.

But hey, let’s look on the bright side. It’s not all grim! In a beautiful display of British resilience, local councils have announced that due to budget cuts, they will no longer be filling potholes. Instead, they are going to rebrand them as “micro-wildlife preserves” and charge us a congestion fee for driving through them. So the next time your suspension snaps on the high street, just remember: you didn’t just ruin your axle; you disrupted a sanctuary for urban tadpoles. Progress!

Stay safe, look both ways before crossing the algorithm, and remember to smile for the facial recognition cameras.

Houston, We Have a New Problem: Geopolitics in Orbit (Extended Version)

Remember Tim Marshall’s Prisoners of Geography and follow up Future of Geography? He brilliantly showed how mountains, rivers, and coastlines shape nations and their destinies. Well, hold onto your spacesuits, because the final frontier is about to become the ultimate geopolitical battleground. What was once the stuff of science fiction is now headline news: spy satellites playing lunar peek-a-boo, space mining for trillion-dollar asteroids, and boots on Mars – all within our lifetime.  

Forget the Cold War; this is the Cosmic Cold War. And it’s heating up faster than a rocket re-entering the atmosphere. Just this week, the world’s space agencies huddled in Milan, hatching plans for lunar outposts and orbital dominance. It’s like a real-life Star Wars summit, only with more PowerPoint presentations and slightly less Death Star construction.  

The Americans, ever the pioneers, are rallying allies for their Artemis program, aiming to put the first woman and person of colour on the moon. Think of it as the ultimate “We choose to go to the Moon” speech, but with a more diverse cast and a hefty dose of international collaboration. Meanwhile, the Chinese, not to be outdone, are building their own space station, the Tiangong, a shining symbol of their growing technological prowess and ambition. And the Russians… well, let’s just say they weren’t invited to the party this time. Seems like invading your neighbour puts a bit of a damper on your spacefaring social calendar.  

But it’s not just nations vying for cosmic supremacy. Private companies are blasting off too, scrambling to keep up with Elon Musk’s SpaceX, which is already dominating the orbital lanes like a cosmic Amazon delivery service. Imagine a future where instead of next-day delivery, you get next-orbit delivery. “Need a new smartphone? No problem, we’ll launch it into space and have it parachuted to your doorstep in 30 minutes!”

This new space race is about more than just bragging rights. It’s about resources, strategic advantage, and the future of humanity. Who controls the moon controls the high ground of the solar system. Who mines the asteroids controls the raw materials of tomorrow. And who establishes the first permanent lunar base might just get to write the rules for the next chapter of human history.

It seems we humans have a knack for taking our squabbles wherever we go. We’ve polluted the Earth, carved it up into competing territories, and now we’re setting our sights on the stars. As Douglas Adams might have put it, “Space is big. Really big. You just won’t believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. And apparently, there’s not enough room for all of us to behave ourselves.”

So buckle up, Earthlings. The race for space is on, and it’s going to be a wild ride. Let’s just hope we don’t end up exporting our terrestrial troubles to the rest of the universe. After all, the cosmos has enough black holes already. And the last thing we need is to turn the Milky Way into a cosmic junkyard, littered with the debris of our earthly conflicts.

———————

The Facts

The International Astronautical Congress (IAC) since 1950 has been a venue for the scientists, engineers, companies and political leaders of spacefaring nations to discuss cooperation, even in times of heightened tensions among world powers. This year’s conference will put the space minds of two top rivals – the U.S. and China – under one roof. But Russia’s space agency Roscosmos, a storied power now isolated from the West after Moscow’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, will have no official presence, highlighting the latest fault lines in space cooperation. Nearly all of the 77 member countries of the International Astronautical Federation (IAF), the non-profit that organises IAC, have turned out for talks on what attendees expect will touch heavily on lunar exploration, NASA’s growing coalition of countries under its Artemis moon program and Europe’s pressing need for more sovereign access to space. NASA administrator Bill Nelson is expected to rally support at IAC for agency’s strategy to tap private companies to replace the ageing International Space Station after its 2030 retirement. The more than two-decade old orbiting science laboratory has been a symbol of space diplomacy led primarily by the U.S. and Russia, despite conflicts on Earth. NASA, which is investing billions of dollars in its flagship Artemis moon program, has been keen on maintaining a presence in low-Earth orbit to compete with China’s Tiangong space station, which has continuously housed Chinese astronauts for three years. The U.S. and China are also racing to land this decade the first humans on the moon since the last American Apollo mission in 1972. The two space powers are aggressively courting partner countries and leaning heavily on private companies for their moon programs, shaping the space objectives of smaller space agencies along the way.

Musk’s SpaceX and its workhorse Falcon 9 is relied upon by much of the Western world for accessing space, driving countries—including the U.S.—to encourage new space upstarts that can offer more affordable rockets. And SpaceX’s growing Starlink internet network has made the company the world’s largest satellite operator. Europe regained un-crewed access to orbit with the test flight of its Ariane 6 launcher in July. But capacity remains constrained by the cutting of ties with Russia, whose Soyuz rockets played a key role for the continent before the Ukraine war. Europe’s satellite manufacturing industry is also facing growing pressures as a once-thriving market for its large, bespoke geostationary satellites faces heavy pressure from constellations in low Earth orbit such as SpaceX’s Starlink. Italy’s Leonardo, one of the hosts of the week-long event, has called for a new strategy for the space sector embracing its French joint venture partner Thales and their main rival in satellite manufacturing, Airbus. Industry sources say the three companies are involved in preliminary talks about combining their satellite activities, but much will depend on the attitude of a new European Commission, which blocked past efforts to forge a single player. European strategists argue space is a worldwide market, and forcing European companies to preserve choice within the same region misses the bigger picture of global competition. NASA’s effort to seed privately built replacements to the ISS is driving some transatlantic tie-ups, such as the joint venture formed this year between Airbus and U.S. space operations firm Voyager to help capture European demand for low-Earth orbit research and operations.

Prada on the Moon: When Fashion Finally Achieves Escape Velocity

Well, readers, it seems the line between science fiction and reality has become blurrier than a Vogon’s poetry recital after a few Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters. Yes, you read that right: Prada is designing spacesuits.

Apparently, those intrepid astronauts bouncing around the lunar surface in 2026 will be doing so in high-fashion, courtesy of the Italian luxury brand. One can only imagine the design meetings:

“Darling, the spacesuit simply must have a more streamlined silhouette. Perhaps a cinched waist and some strategically placed pockets for moon rocks?”

“But sir, what about the thermal insulation and radiation shielding?”

“Details, details! We can’t have astronauts compromising on style just because they’re venturing into the unforgiving vacuum of space, can we?”

I must admit, I’m rather curious to see the final product. Will it be a sleek, minimalist number in Prada’s signature black nylon? Or perhaps a more avant-garde creation with oversized pockets and a detachable cape for dramatic lunar entrances?

And what about the accessories? A matching moon boot with a chunky heel? A lunar-dust-resistant handbag for carrying those essential extraterrestrial survival items (lipstick, a compact mirror, and a spare oxygen tank)?

Of course, this begs the question: what happens when fashion clashes with functionality? Will the astronauts be forced to choose between a perfectly tailored spacesuit and, you know, not suffocating!

Perhaps we will see a new breed of lunar explorer emerge, one who can navigate treacherous craters in stilettos and analyse rock samples while sporting a chic visor.

One thing’s for sure: this is a giant leap for mankind… and a fashionable strut for the fashion industry. Who knows, maybe one day we’ll all be sipping cosmic lattes in our Prada spacesuits, contemplating the meaning of life amidst the stars. Just try not to spill any on the lunar rover, okay!