The Day The Playground Remembered

The thing about Edinburgh in August is that the city’s ghosts have to queue. They’re suddenly outnumbered, you see, jostling for space between a silent mime from Kyoto, a twenty-person acapella group from Yale wearing sponsored lanyards, and a man juggling flaming pineapples. The whole place becomes a glorious, pop-up psychic bruise. I was mainlining this year’s particular vintage of glorious chaos when I stumbled past the Preston Street Primary School. It’s a perfectly normal school playground. Brightly painted walls, a climbing frame, the faint, lingering scent of disinfectant and existential dread. Except this particular patch of publicly-funded joy is built on a historical feedback loop of profound unpleasantness. It’s a place that gives you a profound system error in the soul; a patch of reality where the source code of the past has started bleeding through the brightly coloured, EU-regulated safety surfacing of the present. It’s the kind of psychic stain that makes you think, not of a hamster exploding, but of the day the children’s laughter started to sound digitally corrupted, looping with the faint, static-laced echo of a hangman’s final prayer. It’s the chilling feeling that if you looked too closely at the kids’ innocent crayon drawings of their families, you’d notice they had instinctively, unconsciously, drawn one of the stick figures hanging from a tree.

So naturally, in my Fringe-addled brain, I pictured the school’s inevitable entry into the festival programme. It’s the hit no one saw coming: “Our Playground of Perpetual Shame: A Musical!”, brought to you by the kids of P4. The opening number is a banger, all about the 1586 construction of the gibbet, with a perky chorus about building the walls high “so the doggos can’t steal the bodies!” It’s got that dark, primary-colour simplicity that really resonates with the critics. The centrepiece is a complex, heavily choreographed piece depicting the forty-three members of Clan Macgregor being hanged for their murderous beef with the Colquhouns. Mr. Dumbeldor from P.E. has them doing it with skipping ropes. It’s avant-garde, it’s visceral, it’s a logistical nightmare for the school trip permission slips.

The second act, of course, delves into the ethnic cleansing of the Romani people under James VI. It’s a tough subject, but the kids handle it with a chillingly naive sincerity. They re-enact the 1624 arrest of their “captain,” John Faa, and the great rescue attempt. Little Gavin Trotter, played by the smallest kid in P1, is “cunningly conveyed away” from a prison of gym mats while the audience (mostly horrified parents) is encouraged to create a distracting “shouting and crying.” It’s the most authentic immersive theatre experience on the circuit. They even have a whole number for General Montrose, whose torso was buried right under what is now the sandbox. His niece, played by a girl with a glittery pink art box, comes to retrieve his heart. It’s a tender, if anatomically questionable, moment.

Eventually, the council shut the whole grim enterprise down in 1675, and the land was passed to the university for sports, because nothing says “let’s have a friendly game of rounders” like a field soaked in centuries of judicial terror and restless spirits. Now, kids play there. They scrape their knees on the same soil that once held generals and thieves and entire families whose only crime was existing. And you watch them, in their little hi-vis jackets, and you have to wonder. Maybe this Fringe show isn’t an act. Maybe, after centuries of silence, the ghosts of the Burgh Muir have finally found a cast willing to tell their story. And judging by the queues, they’re heading for a five-star review.

The Great British Firewall: A User’s Guide to Digital Dissent

Gather round, citizens, and breathe a collective sigh of relief. Our benevolent government, in its infinite wisdom, has finally decided to protect us from the most terrifying threat of our age: unregulated thoughts. The Online Safety Act, a wonderful bipartisan effort, is here to make sure the internet is finally as safe and predictable as a wet weekend in Bognor.

First, we must applaud the sheer genius of criminalising any “false” statement that might cause “non-trivial psychological harm.” Finally, a law to protect us from the sheer agony of encountering an opinion we disagree with online. The Stasi could only have dreamed of such a beautifully subjective tool for ensuring social harmony. Worried that someone on the internet might be wrong about something? Fear not! The state is here to shield your delicate psyche.

And in a masterstroke of efficiency, a single government minister can now change the censorship rules on a whim, without any of that bothersome Parliamentary debate. It seems we’ve finally streamlined the messy business of democracy into a much more efficient, top-down model. Dictators of old, with their tedious committees and rubber-stamp parliaments, would be green with envy at such elegant power.

Already, our social media feeds are becoming so much tidier. Those messy videos of protests outside migrant hotels and other “harmful” displays of public opinion are being quietly swept away. And with the threat of fines up to 10% of their global turnover, our favourite tech giants are now wonderfully motivated to keep our digital spaces free from anything . . . well, inconvenient.

Don’t you worry about those private, encrypted chats on WhatsApp and Signal, either. The government would just like a quick peek, purely for safety reasons, of course. The 20th century had secret police opening your letters and tapping phone lines; we have just modernised the service for the digital age. It’s reassuring to know our government care so much.

But the true genius of this plan is how it protects the children. By making the UK internet a heavily monitored and censored walled garden, we are inadvertently launching the most effective digital literacy program in the nation’s history. Demand for VPNs has surged as everyone, children included, learns how to pretend they are in another country. We are not just protecting them; we’re pushing them with gusto into the thrilling, unregulated wilderness of the global internet.

And now, with the rise of AI, this “educational initiative” is set to accelerate. The savvy will not just use VPNs; they’ll deploy AI-powered tools that can dynamically generate new ways to bypass filters, learning and adapting faster than any regulator can keep up. Imagine a teenager asking a simple AI agent to “rewrite this request so it gets past the block,” a process that will become as second nature as using a search engine is today.

This push towards mandatory age verification and content filtering draws uncomfortable parallels. While the UK’s Online Safety Act is framed around protection, its methods—requiring platforms to proactively scan and remove content, and creating powers to block non-compliant services—rhyme with the architecture of China’s “Great Firewall.” The core difference, for now, is intent. China’s laws are explicitly designed to suppress political dissent and enforce state ideology. The UK’s act is designed to protect users from harm. Yet both result in a state-sanctioned narrowing of the open internet.

The comparison to North Korea is, of course, hyperbole, but it highlights a worrying trend. Where North Korea achieves total information control through an almost complete lack of internet access for its citizens, the UK is achieving a different kind of control through legislation. By creating a system where access to the global, unfiltered internet requires active circumvention, we are creating a two-tiered digital society: a sanitised, monitored internet for the masses, and the real internet for those with the technical skills to find the back door. What a wonderful way to prepare our youth for the future.

And to enforce this new digital conformity, a brand-new police unit will be monitoring our social media for any early signs of dissent. A modern-day Stasi for the digital age, or perhaps Brown Shirts for the broadband generation, tasked with ensuring our online chatter remains on-brand. It’s a bold move, especially when our existing police force finds it challenging enough to police our actual streets. But why bother with the messy reality of physical crime when you can ascend to the higher calling of policing our minds? Why allocate resources to burglaries when you can hunt down a non-compliant meme or a poorly phrased opinion?

It’s comforting to know that our new Digital Thought Police are watching. While this Sovietisation of Britain continues at a blistering pace, one can’t help but feel they’ve neglected something. Perhaps they could next legislate against bad weather? That causes me non-trivial psychological harm on a regular basis. But then again, democracy was a lovely idea, wasn’t it? All that messy debate and disagreement. This new, state-approved quiet is much more orderly.